Why might a defendant choose to admit liability before trial?

A defendant might choose to admit liability before trial primarily to avoid a lengthy court process. Admitting liability can lead to quicker resolution of a case, potentially allowing both parties to reach a settlement without the need for prolonged litigation. This can save time, resources, and legal expenses associated with going to trial. Furthermore, it can also reduce the emotional stress for the parties involved, as trials can be contentious and taxing.

In addition, admitting liability may also position a defendant favorably in negotiations for damages, particularly if they can demonstrate a willingness to take responsibility and resolve matters amicably. This can lead to more efficient case management and possibly a lesser outcome in terms of damages assessed by the court.

Other options, such as resetting limitation periods or increasing potential damages, do not align with legal practices regarding admissions of liability. Such admissions usually do not reset limitation periods nor do they inherently increase the damages that might be awarded in a case. Rather, acknowledging liability typically indicates acceptance of responsibility and can guide discussions toward fair compensation, rather than inflating potential damages.