What would typically prompt a Judicial Review?

A judicial review is primarily concerned with the legality of decisions made by administrative bodies or tribunals. This legal process allows higher courts to assess whether an administrative agency acted within its authority, whether it followed proper procedures, and whether it adhered to principles of fairness and justice.

In this context, a challenge to an administrative body's decision arises when an individual or entity believes that the decision was made improperly, unjustly, or outside of the powers granted to that body. Judicial review serves as a critical mechanism to ensure that public bodies do not abuse their authority and that individuals have recourse to correct potential wrongs.

While allegations of misconduct in trial procedures are certainly grounds for appeal, they do not fall under the process of judicial review regarding administrative decisions. Similarly, a request for a new trial pertains to the trial process itself and not administrative decisions, and dispute resolution between parties often involves negotiation or other forms of alternative dispute resolution, rather than judicial review. Thus, the correct answer represents the specific context in which judicial review is applicable, making it the most relevant choice in understanding this legal concept.